At important points of his career, and initially to great surprise, Derrida identified deconstruction with both justice and democracy. As well, much of Derrida’s later work is engaged with questions of borders, friendship, nationality, and cosmopolitanism. These questions are urgent for any political theory concerned with conceiving justice in postmodernity, founding collectivity in notions of difference, forging a relation between ethics and politics, and thinking about (or against) the nation without nationalism. What is the fate of these questions? How does Derrida’s work change the terrain of political theorizing? What are the possibilities and limitations of that changed terrain?
-
Recent Posts
- M. Naas: “‘Alors, qui êtes-vous?’ Jacques Derrida and the Question of Hospitality”
- D. Perpich: Universality, Singularity, and Sexual Difference: Reflections on Political Community
- C. Wise: “Saying ‘Yes” to Africa: Jacques Derrida’s Spectres of Marx.”
- S.A. Chambers: “Ghostly Rights”
- C. Delacampagne: The Politics of Derrida: Revisiting the Past
-
Recent Comments
Category Cloud
Tags
a-venir alterity cities community confusions democracy-to-come Derrida enlightenment ethics executive feminism Foucault Globalization Heidegger hospitality Husserl identity politics institution interability legislative Levinas modernism Nietzsche Politics of Friendship post-modernism promise queer reason refuge Ricoeur Rogues ruin Signature Event Context social democracy Society Must Be Defended sovereignty Specters of Marx Spectors of Marx speech-act subjectivity Technology The Other Heading the promise translation world governanceArchives